|
 |
|
Patr 111 OBAMA SUCKS
|
« Return to Topics
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 3:10, 06/24/2010
|
"Obama believes in the rule of law -- his law. No other law is relevant. No other
law matters. When Obama speaks, he expects the world to obey. ... Obama can't
comprehend any limitations on his power. ... There have been arrogant presidents
before, but none that can compare to the sickening self-centered narcissism that
exudes from this man." --columnist Henry Lamb
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 17:19, 06/24/2010
|
|
Obama said that people who make less than $250,000 would not experience any tax increase, not one dime. LIE! Today stock dividends are taxed at 15%. In January the rate for most people will be on those will be 39.5%, more than doubled. Lots of lower income people have some stock holdings. Good old Obama!
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 2:14, 07/03/2010
|
"President Obama insisted ... that General McChrystal's departure signals a change
in personnel but not in policy. It's a policy the president can call his own. Our
purpose remains not to kill the Taliban but to register them to vote in Chicago."
--comedian Argus Hamilton
|
|
SBD
|
Posted 14:15, 07/08/2010
|
Everyone can stop beating up macdaddy and here is why
instead of all the well earned negative stuff going around about Obama,
here's an interesting take on the good he has done for this
country......AMEN!
THANK GOD FOR THE PRESIDENT
Written by an 82-year-old very wise lady. She gives us a whole new slant on
the amazing job Obama is doing:
1. He destroyed the Clinton Political Machine - Driving a stake thru the
heart of Hillary's Presidential aspirations - something no Republican was
ever able to do. Remember when a Hillary Presidency scared the daylights out
of you!
2. He killed off the Kennedy Dynasty - No more Kennedy's trolling Washington
looking for booze and women wanting rides home. American women and Freedom
are safer tonight!
3. He is destroying the Democratic Party before our eyes!
Dennis Moore had never lost a race - quit
Evan Bayh had never lost a race - quit
Byron Dorgan - had never lost a race - quit
Harry Reid - Soon to be GONE
These are just a handful of the Democrats whose political careers Obama has
destroyed! By the end of 2010 dozens more will be gone!
In December of 2008 the Democrats were on the rise. In the last two election
cycles they had picked up 14 senate seats and 52 house seats. The press was
touting the death of the Conservative Movement and the Republican Party . In
just one year, Obama put a stop to all of this and will probably give the
house,
if not the senate back to the Republicans.
4. He has completely exposed liberals and progressives for what they are.
Every Generation seems to need to relearn the lesson on why they should
never actually put liberals in charge. He is bringing home the lesson very
well!
Liberals tax, borrow and spend - check
Liberals won't bring themselves to protect America - check
Liberals want to take over the economy - check
Liberals think they know what is best for everyone - check
Liberals aren't happy till they are running YOUR life - check
5. He has brought more Americans back to conservatism than anyone since
Reagan. In One year he rejuvenated the Conservative movement and brought
out to the streets millions of Freedom Loving Americans. Name me one other
time in your life that you saw your friends and neighbors this interested in
taking back America!
6. His amazing leadership has sparked the greatest period of sales of
firearms and ammunition this country has seen. Law abiding citizens have
rallied and have provided a "stimulus" to the sporting goods field while
other industries have failed, faded or moved off-shore!
7. In all honesty one year ago I was more afraid than I had ever been in my
life. Not of the economy but of the direction our country was going. I
thought Americans had forgotten what this country was all about. My
neighbors, friends, strangers proved to me that my lack of confidence of the
Greatness and Wisdom of the American people was flat out wrong.
8. When the American People wake up no smooth talking teleprompter reader
can fool them!
Barak Obama woke up these Great Americans! Again I want to say Thank you
Barak Obama! This is exactly the kind of hope and change we desperately
needed.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 21:9, 07/08/2010
|
SBD -
No idea who wrote that but they were dead on right. November will be the biggest wake up call the Dems have gotten since Obama lost the Olympics.
|
|
thebutcher76
|
Posted 22:16, 07/08/2010
|
|
Sounds like the same thing you guys were saying in 2008 before Obama got elected. You were wrong. I was right. You may be surprised come November. I know it's a couple of years down the road, but he's a two-termer come 2012. Wait and see.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 22:41, 07/08/2010
|
|
butcher - I believe you may be right about him being a 2 termer. The problem was the Republicans let "Independents" vote in their primaries. Democrats didn't. If it wasn't for that, I honestly believe that Romney would have been the Republicans man and the current President. If they don't change the way they do the primaries, the Republicans may have another turd like McCain in 2012.
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 4:7, 07/09/2010
|
"When I became the NASA administrator -- or before I became
the NASA administrator -- [Obama] charged me with three things. One was he wanted me
to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to
expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted
me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with
dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution
to science ... and math and engineering." --NASA Administrator Charles Bolden
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 4:8, 07/09/2010
|
"Unemployment is still at 9.6 [percent]. Yes, but it's not
12 or 13 -- or 15." --Barack Obama, the guy who promised to keep it below 8 percent
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 4:38, 07/09/2010
|
I read some of these comments on Barack Obama and they sound pretty much like the comments my friends made about Bill Clinton.
All the comments revolved around partisan hate. Most of them laid blame for things that one person cant cause by themselves with most of the time it took the terms if not decades before them before him to set in place.
If you look to the truth you have to look at the past. Tax and Spend. Bush blew more money than any tax and spend program ever did. Bush recieved a balanced budget and completely obliterated it. No Republican President has ever offered this country a balanced budget. No democratic President has ever been so vocal about complying with the New World Order than the elder Bush and Dick Cheney who was a past president of one the the major organizations responsible for it. I believe the WTO. I will have to check myself on that but you can see him on speeches on You Tube with the words coming out of his own mouth admitting all of it.
So before you blame it all on Barack Obama just take a second to remember what you were saying about Bill Clinton and remember that Bill Clinton the country was making money, factory production was up and jobs were pretty plentiful. Its just a fact. That period of time was one of the best America has ever had in my life time hands down over any other. Now remember the truth and that your own supposed conservatives seem pretty liberal when it comes to the money "they" want to spend and the people "oil companies" they want to give it to and we are the sheep "they want to take it from" and look at the problems we are having in the Gulf with the Oil Companies right now? Bush called these folks "his base" and he didnt really care what we thought about it and they "The Oil Companies" brought in billions for their stockholders out of our pockets under him and were completely wild with greed. So when youre blaming Barack Obama just remember the past and what really happened and know that if anything a Democrat offered you the best economic time in most of your lives and know that in this day and age your own so called conservatives are admittingly helping ushere in the New World Order and know your own generals give the call of fanaticism and you answer it blathering what ever wild accusations you can muster and you swirl around in a whirling dervish of conservative cheerleading but somehow you are missing the truth. So when your goverment comes calling to put the mark upon you dont be confused, you voted for the guys that kept the power where they needed to be to do it. The truth is that in the smoke mirrors of politics sometimes the real agenda gets lost and that was the agenda all along they dont want you to see.
|
|
FED UP
|
Posted 7:4, 07/09/2010
|
|
Great post, Newday
|
|
Stokes
|
Posted 10:25, 07/09/2010
|
|
No other president has spent the amount of money in their entire term that Obama has spent in his one-half term. Understand I am not saying they have not spent too much money or more importantly wasted way too much money. No other president has apologized to other countries and degraded our nation as he has, no other president has refused to call a terrorist a terrorist, no other president has sued a state for passing a law that mirrors the federal law, no other president has kissed the muslims' @$$ every day. This man is incompetent, period - so criticism is most appropriate. All presidents have been heavily criticized when they screwed up but for some reason, this one is supposed to be above criticism REGARDLESS OF WHAT HE DOES. He is a Daly family Chicago thug that has brought all the Daly trained thugs with him to Washington to surround him so the Chicago machine can continue. Look at the crime rate in that city - one of the highest in the whole country. He has disgraced our nation!!!!
|
|
FED UP
|
Posted 10:52, 07/09/2010
|
"No other president has spent the amount of money in their entire term that Obama has spent in his one-half term".
Stokes, where do you people get your facts from Out of your ***? Seriously, I'd like to know.
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 14:40, 07/09/2010
|
|
The only thing I blame Obama for in regards to the oil spill is his complete lack of response in regards to helping clean the mess up before it destroyed the coast of 5 states. That is 100% his fault. Not Bushs, Clintons, Reagans, Carters, or whoever else he may try to blame.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 22:52, 07/09/2010
|
|
I dont guess BP had anything to do with it Fiesta. I guess since its gushing thousands of barrels a day it might just be dang near impossible to do anything with it. Blame all you want but dont forget BP.
|
|
SBD
|
Posted 23:8, 07/09/2010
|
|
fed sucker, the numbers list were as a percentage of gross bnational product. Would't you say our GNP id quite higher now than when HT was president? That would mean the dollar volume is way off due to inflation so you just shot yourself in the foot again with that post. Do us a favor, next time aim higher.
|
|
white american
|
Posted 8:34, 07/10/2010
|
|
FED UP, why no comments from you regarding the voter intimidation from the black hate group that YOUR prez is protecting? Do you also believe blacks should kill whites, and kill white babies?
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 3:12, 07/11/2010
|
white american: Exactly. The long-legged mac-daddy thug will always protect other thugs. And, as you know, he and his gorilla hate whites.
In part.....Former Justice Department attorney, J. Christian Adams quit over the handling of the case (voter intimidation). Adams made allegations that his former supervisors instructed attorneys to ignore cases that involved black defendants and white victims. These allegations have sparked a new round of subpenas from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights as well as a call for a separate federal probe.
The Obama Administration won a default judgement when the Black Panthers failed to show up in court in April 2009. A month later the Administration decided to DROP the CHARGES against the group. The criminal complaint against Samir Shabazz did result in an injunction in-which it was stated that he can't appear in a polling station in Philadelphia until after 2012. Malik Shabazz said that Samir was suspended before being reinstated by the Black Panther Party.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 10:20, 07/11/2010
|
Yeah you said similar things about Clinton,
The greatest time of prosperity weve ever had with a balanced budget and all was focused on was the fact that the man likes women. Amazing. Not one can satisfy you. But the facts are the facts was a great economic time indeed.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 15:46, 07/11/2010
|
Newday -
Honestly, why to you keep talking about the economy and Clinton? Yes times were good and yes he was President, but he really didn't have anything to do with it. You do realize that the internet was what caused Clintons great economy don't you? It was made public in 1992 (a good year for Clinton). That drove the Microsofts, Yahoos, Amazons, Dells, and others that caused the stock market to skyrocket during the 90's. They were what had value increases in the 10,000's of percents. Not the GE's or Fords, it was the internet related tech market. It wasn't anything Clinton did. In fact he wisely just sit back and let (the Reagan appointed) Greenspan run the economy.
As far as a budget goes, it is easy to balance a budget when the only time you use the military is on days that people testify against you in Senate hearings. Then you don't maintain the missle stockpiles and other equipment neccessary for a well maintained military. Just punt that duty (and expense) on to the next guy.
Overall I had no real problem with Clinton, other than him not maintaining the military like he should and claiming a balanced budget because of that. The economy was great but he had nothing to do with it, unless you want to try to say that his Vice President invented the internet, then you might have a leg to stand on with crediting him for the economy.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 21:7, 07/11/2010
|
Well if I believe what you said as you obviously do then its believeable that George Bush put us in the mess we are in both of them. After all Obama didnt have anything to do with the war now did he? He didnt invent that as far as I know. In fact during Clintons time we had peace, 2 bushs later weve had an awful lot of war.--expensive war. There is where all your money went --to halliburton.
Regardless during the Clinton terms we had less debt we can just throw out the prosperity according to you because it doesnt count. Ok fine. Less debt--Balanced budget---Less debt. Now who is conservative and who is spending all the money? I still see the Repubicans each and every time.
You talk of tax and spend democrats but you fail to take the blame for shootem up cowboy republicans.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 22:3, 07/11/2010
|
|
Clinton came in on the coattails of the Nation's financial situation set in place by Reagan. Clinton reaped what others sowed. Clinton did not help the situation. But he did not do so much damage to it either.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 22:29, 07/11/2010
|
I do blame Bush for some of the mess. Of course he didn't run out and pick a fight either. In case you forgot we were attacked on 9-11. The war was brought here, unless of course you are one of those that think that Bush blew up the WTC.
Oh yeah, don't forget that Halliburton had no bid contracts under Clinton as well. I guess you could say that the bombings on days that he was being testified against were just to give money to the evil Halliburton too can't you?
One more thing...are you blaming Obama for ramping up the war in Afganistan? You know, for blowing all our money as a "shootem up cowboy" and still using Halliburton?
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 11:30, 07/12/2010
|
WMD that was never found,hunting for Bin Laden in the wrong place for years and finally admitting he was in Afghanistan and surrounding area. The war was about Oil. Our problem was somewhere else we just used a reason to intervene where we wanted to. Truthfully why should we give a rats ass if those people over there want to keep killing each other? Why should we even be involved and why should we have to pay for it. We should have put a soldier behind every rock in Afghanistan--took out Bin Laden, laid waste to Al-Quaida then worried about any interests we had in Iraq. They werent going anywhere and if they did much just nuke em. Yeah all of em. So we wasted a lot of money that we will never see back. Thats the point Im making and Obama now wants to go to where the fight is and you guys start crying. That bi-partisan mess you spread gets in the way of doing the right thing and you cant seem to see it when youre guy is acting for his self interest of his political support. It seems in situations such as these you might put your differences aside and support the purpose that we actually said we were going to go over there to start with and that is to stop Al-Quaida and Bin Laden.
If you folks would deal with the shortcomings of your own maybe you would finally understand why American decided hell Donald Duck is better than these guys. Who ever thought a person with a Muslim name would get elected here as a president. It happened because the Republicans were true to only one thing--other Republicans. Most of you guys are what the higher end Republicans refer to as the Great Unwashed. Maybe when you realize they feel that way about you then you will realize how they drum you up and send you out to the field with your blathering battle cry making all those wild accusations. Then again maybe you wont.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 16:35, 07/12/2010
|
newday, give us your reaction to these 5 sentences.
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.
5. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 17:15, 07/12/2010
|
|
All True Oogie!
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 20:39, 07/12/2010
|
Wow Newday -
That was a lot of words to say nothing. I am not saying anything is wrong with going harder in Afganistan. I asked you if you are blaming Obama of being a "shootem up cowboy" and still just going to war to give our money to Haliburton on no bid contracts. That was a big part of your earlier rant and Obama is doing the exact same thing you are blaming Bush for.
Why no constancy?
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 21:21, 07/12/2010
|
|
No he is cleaning up the mess he got left to deal with. Im not blaming him the man is just doing his job. I wasnt avoiding I guess I just found other things to address.Im sure your guys saw to it that Halliburton has iron clad contracts and that business is already done. Once again Bush, Bush and Cheney representing their base.
|
|
FED UP
|
Posted 4:13, 07/13/2010
|
white american Posted 8:34, 07/10/2010
FED UP, why no comments from you regarding the voter intimidation from the black hate group that YOUR prez is protecting? Do you also believe blacks should kill whites, and kill white babies?
Bush DOJ decided New Black Panthers no major case
5:12 pm July 12, 2010, by ctucker
Several of you have clamored for me to say something about the alleged voter intimidation case in Philadelphia, which involves a thuggish group who call themselves the “New Black Panthers.” (While I was no fan of the original Black Panthers, they don’t deserve to have their reputation further befouled by this group. The two groups are in no way related.)
I was loathe to comment since I know that no rational discussion will follow. How could it? It was clear from the beginning that this was not a case of voter intimidation against anyone who might vote for John McCain. As many observers noted on that day, no matter how badly those two New Black Panters were behaving (and the police were called and responded), it’s a HEAVILY DEMOCRATIC PRECINCT. As blogger Ben Smith noted way back then, “You don’t typically intimidate your own voters.”
But solid reporting from Media Matters and Adam Serwer of The American Prospect ought to put this nonsense to rest (it won’t, but it should). The charges against the New Black Panthers were downgraded by the Bush Department of Justice:
The decision not to file a criminal case occurred before Obama was even in office.
This means that the case was downgraded to a civil case 11 days before Obama was inaugurated, 26 days before Eric Holder became attorney general, and about nine months before Thomas Perez was confirmed as head of the Civil Rights Division.
From Media Matters:
white american, why no comments from you regarding the voter intimidation from the black hate group that YOUR prez protected? Do you also believe blacks should kill whites, and kill white babies?
Now what?
|
|
white american
|
Posted 8:56, 07/13/2010
|
fu posted "The decision not to file a criminal case occurred before Obama was even in office."
Just to keep the facts straight, there were charges filed against these two. The DOJ won the case in absentia. The DOJ was then told by obama to drop the case. This is public record, now what?
|
|
FED UP
|
Posted 9:1, 07/13/2010
|
|
Obama's DOJ dropped the civil case, not the criminal case. That was YOUR prez, tha's what.
|
|
ccrider
|
Posted 9:43, 07/13/2010
|
|
Barrack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is the best half breed hines 57 variety we have ever had in Washington. He knows nothing and takes up for the Union, Blacks, and the Muslims. What a piece of crap and some of you were stupid enough to beleive in change, well 2 cents you have a looser in office and a lot of change, all bad.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 10:18, 07/13/2010
|
Newday -
I guess that says it all. I don't understand how people can only see evil in one side and good on their side. Personally I think both Republicans and Democrats are just two turds in the same punchbowl. I am smart enough to see the good and bad in both of them.
I guess in you are in the same boat as Glenn Beck, Rushed Up, Rush Limbaugh, Kayne West, etc. Welcome to that elite club.
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 12:10, 07/13/2010
|
|
newday, You are wasting your time trying to make Fiesta understand anything. He is a complete moron that constantly changes sides. If you will notice in one post this multiple personality idiot will defend the true enemy of all Americans that is the republican party and then he calls them turds. Don't waste your time on someone who is beneath you.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 14:20, 07/13/2010
|
|
Oh yes. another one
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 14:43, 07/13/2010
|
Fiesta,
First let me say Im not trying to convert your beliefs but I will say this much for you to mull over.
Two turds in a punch bowl--New World Order--Tea Party--Smoke and Mirrors--What is the truth?
What I think is the most important things in politics is what is really happening behind the scenes. Neither side is completely immune but the largest contributor to the NWO-New World Order had been the Republican Party, That is not to say that the Dems might not have.
If you will take the time to You Tube--New World Order and then read the Wikipedia explanation--scan it at least its very long, you will start to understand what is at stake here.
The New World Order is being thrust upon us because our politicians thought it was best for us not the other way around.
The Tea Party actually is a diversion to help install the final blows of it. You are told that the Right is the only Right and the left is evil because the sensical reasoning is over money. What you are not told is that the Bushs and Dick Cheney were huge proponnent of it. You are told we are losing everything American we ever had, what you are not told is who has been selling you out the whole time.
So a conservatively minded individual thinks okay I really need to be conservative now and follows almost blindly trying to save America when the whole time you are being led into a pen.
Its a very ugly proposition you must choose what side you are on and its really confusing when you think that by choosing the Right you are saving America and its hard to see what is truly happening. I prefer not to be on the Left but at least if we are going to be broke we can be broke together and we can be free. Im scared of the Right and Im scared of The Mark. I will not take it and will die before they put it on me.
Look to your own reasoning but by God look hard you will be upset with what you find I nearly guarantee it. Im not some leftist, Im as conservative as they come, unaffiliated which sprang from a democratic base. I believe in hard work, independence and not following the crowd. The crowd will get you in trouble. Those people you mentioned in your previous post wont be there when they ask you to submit but they will lead you there and laugh all the way to the bank.
Evil lurks is sheeps clothing they cause up a ruckus because they do not want you to see but the truth has been in front of you the whole time. Too many believe the pied piper and he is leading us all away.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 15:6, 07/13/2010
|
Newday -
Now that is a very interesting post.
As far as the NWO goes, I haven't ever read Wikipedia or much else on it. I know what it is about already. It is Biblical. We all know it is coming. Revelations will tell you all you need to know about it. I will probably end up reading the Wiki article now just out of curiousity though.
As far as NWO goes, there are two big Biblical components. Money and religion. As far as money goes, I know who you think is leading us down that path and I will not disagree with you. As far as religion goes, who do you think is doing that? What party wants either no mention of God anywhere or wants to regulate God into some generic god that is just a vague term?
As far as the mark goes, that is a much more important topic. There is nothing you, I, or anyone else can do to stop the coming NWO. You said those I mentioned in an earlier post will not be there when I am told to take the mark. I can 100% guarentee that I will not be around when people are told to take it either. I will be with God before then.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 15:35, 07/13/2010
|
I disagree with you Fiesta it could be prevented but likely it will not. World Markets are wrong. Markets is right, local markets. Each of us in every corner of the world learns to take care of himself. It isnt necessary that we do Global Business just adapt to the business of where we live. If people choose to be dominated by tyrants then let them be. If that country stands up to fight, fight them. The only new world order we ever needed was free independent men and women. Not men and women conjoined in one purpose that that purpose is to feed the world markets and someone elses pocketbook. Take care of your own, die if its your time and pass freedom onto the next generation. If you think their isnt anything you can do likely nothing will be done. As the prophesy reads and nearly every age has thought it was the last before the apocalype we also do not have to be. I hope you do read about NWO and you tube the same.
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 16:29, 07/13/2010
|
|
Fiesta, I apologize to you. I now see that newday is just as looney as you with all this nwo and mark BS.
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 16:49, 07/13/2010
|
|
I am sorry common...did you say something? All I heard was "Bush hates black people" blah, blah, blah, "vast right wing conspiracy" blah, blah, blah, "9-11 was an inside job", blah, blah, blah.....
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 18:38, 07/13/2010
|
|
Fiesta, Have you ever considered seeking help for the mental problem you must have. You must be hearing voices and seeing things that are not really there. I don't see anything in those two posts that say anything about Bush, 9/11 or any of that you claim I said. Please get help for this before you hurt yourself or somebody else with your visions and voices in your head. Also keep posting I love it when you make yourself look so looney.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 20:3, 07/13/2010
|
Commonsense,
Dont be so judgemental one minute you like me and the next you dont. I wanted to give Fiesta something to think about because its a lot to think about. In fact Fiesta is right about one thing, there is probably no turning back but its a long way off if it ever happens. Im not one world order looney but the evidence is there none the less. Check it out yourself if youve a mind you might be surprised what you do find. Fiesta can get carried away a little and get a might off track for sure. Not sure what to make of politics these days at times but Im sure tired of making oil people rich.
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 22:59, 07/13/2010
|
|
Newday, You would be taken serious if you did not talk about crazy things like NWO and marks. The points about the oil companies are right but then you ran every intelligent person from your side with the crazy things.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 0:20, 07/14/2010
|
Commonsense,
You need look this up for yourself.Go to You Tube type in New World Order. Then play outtakes from George Bush and Dick Cheney. When you see the words come out of George Bush Sr. and Dick Cheneys mouth if that doesnt startle you nothing will. It will surely give you something to think about. Come to your own conclusions. One world goverment may be a ways off but it is definite there has been a plan in place for a long time.
Regardless of what people think about me or anyone else the evidence speaks for itself.
I do my own research and come to my own conclusions from varied sources and all that speaks for itself. If there is smoke there is generally fire. Sure I expounded to the future a little farther than the average person would look to and perhaps worry about for this lifetime but I have children and those children may have to live in the society we create. If man can dream of it it can be made the pity is that someone dreamt of a New World Order and its become a goal and pet project of the ultra rich to usher it in. There may not be a thing we can do about it but denying it will not make it go away. The rest of the story is yours to imagine what could happen when something like this does occur. If all of the bad things we read in the bible are correct then the prophesies may be fulfilled. If its not then there isnt anything to worry about.
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 0:36, 07/14/2010
|
|
Newday, I will not waste my time researching such rediculous things. I also would not take much of anything that one of the Bush's or Cheney said as being true. If you want to be scared of your own shadow then go ahead.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 7:26, 07/14/2010
|
|
Its not so ridiculous at all and for you to think that shows me how informed you are. Scared of my shadow no, cautious as to whom I vote for. Yes. You managed to miss the entire point I was trying to make by saying Ya, Ya, Ya bunch of malarky. At least Im not living with my head in a hole. Add you to the folks just on here to make noise.
|
|
semi-sweet
|
Posted 7:36, 07/14/2010
|
|
Anyone that uses You Tube as a credible reference, should not expect to be taken seriously. You could probably take certain quotes from Obama's 1,000's of speeches, and make it seem that he likes whites, but that doesn't make it true.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 8:11, 07/14/2010
|
A Failed Obama Hero By Walter Williams
"Let's think about President Obama's failed economic stimulus program. Before getting to the nitty-gritty of why stimulus packages fail, let's look at the failed stimulus program of Obama's hero, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. FDR's Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, wrote in his diary: "We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. … We have never made good on our promises. … I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started … and an enormous debt to boot!"
Morgenthau was being a bit gracious. The unemployment figures for FDR's first eight years were: 18 percent in 1935; 14 percent in 1936; by 1938, unemployment was back to 20 percent. The stock market fell nearly 50 percent between August 1937 and March 1938. Columnist Walter Lippmann wrote, "With almost no important exception every measure he (Roosevelt) has been interested in for the past five months has been to reduce or discourage the production of wealth." The last year of the Herbert Hoover administration, the top marginal income tax rate was raised from 24 to 63 percent. During the Roosevelt administration, the top rate was raised at first to 79 percent and then later to 90 percent. Hillsdale College economic historian Professor Burton Folsom notes that in 1941, Roosevelt even proposed a whopping 99.5 percent marginal rate on all incomes over $100,000. Much more of the Hoover/FDR fiasco can be found in "Great Myths of the Great Depression" (http://fee.org/articles/great-myths-of-the-great-depression/).
The Great Depression did not end until after WWII. Why it lasted so long went unanswered until Harold L. Cole, professor of economics at the University of Pennsylvania, and Lee E. Ohanian, professor of economics at UCLA, published their research project "How Government Prolonged the Depression" in the Journal of Political Economy (August 2004). Professor Cole explained, "The fact that the Depression dragged on for years convinced generations of economists and policy-makers that capitalism could not be trusted to recover from depressions and that significant government intervention was required to achieve good outcomes. Ironically, our work shows that the recovery would have been very rapid had the government not intervened." Professors Cole and Ohanian argue that FDR's economic policies added at least seven years to the depression.
Where do the trillion-plus dollars come from that Congress and Obama are spending in an effort to stimulate the economy? How about Santa Claus, or maybe the Tooth Fairy? If you said, "Come on, Williams, you're being silly! The only way government can spend a dollar is to tax or borrow it," go to the head of the class. In the case of a tax, one should ask what would that taxpayer have done with the dollar had it not been taxed away. He would have spent it on something that would have created a job for someone. If the government hadn't borrowed the dollar, it might have been invested in some project that would have created a job. When government taxes, borrows and spends, it shifts unemployment from one sector to another. Of course, the sector that benefits tends to be a political favorite of the shifter.
Between 1787 and 1930, our nation has seen both mild and severe economic downturns, sometimes called panics, that have ranged from one to seven years. During that interval, no one considered it to be the business of the federal government to try to get the economy out of a depression because there was no constitutional authority to do so. It took Hoover, FDR and a frightened and derelict U.S. Supreme Court to turn what might have been a three- or four-year sharp downturn into a 15-year meltdown."
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 8:14, 07/14/2010
|
|
semisweet makes an extremely silly putdown of Youtube. Youtube is a place where video clips can be viewed. It shows people saying what they said. That is as credible as it gets.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 9:15, 07/14/2010
|
Oogie I find a lot of truth in your post. One thing though for clarification. I dont believe the stimulus "which I disagreed on" was all Obamas. I think that was decided on actually during the last of Bush's term, proposed and Obama came along and did what he did. Am I wrong? I dont think so. The money was delivered under Obama I do know that much.
I agree the money could have been put to better use. It would have been better to put people in small businesses at least some people would have been able to work and put others to work.
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 10:49, 07/14/2010
|
|
Oogie, I don't know why you would be naive enough to beleive the big oil companies are making very little. I suppose a super wealthy person as yourself owns a lot of their stock is why you are spreading this youtube lie. Maybe you have someone else fill up your car with gas and have not noticied they are charging record high prices while stealing most of the oil from Iraq. You don't really think our soldiers are there for any noble reason do you. I also would be interested in which party the two so called economics experts in your other post belong to. My guess would be definetly republican to publish some made up BS as they are saying.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 22:37, 07/14/2010
|
|
The 20billion promised to clean up the Gulf. That was only 1yrs profits for just one oil company. The percentage may be low but the profits are high due to volume.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 18:7, 07/16/2010
|
|
Based on the comments of commonsense (how misnamed!), he/she would prefer that the oil companies operate at a loss. And if common would wish that for those employees, then the Golden Rule say common would want that for a personal situation. How about it- anyone thrilled at the prospect of working for a business that is losing money? The distribution of petroleum products involves pipelines, tanker trucks, home delivery dealers and retail stations- all of which are NOT owned by the major oil companies. If all profits were taken from the major oil companies and that money used to reduce fuel prices, the reduction would be less than 5 cents per gallon. Common, why do you say this is BS? Do you want those companies to go broke and cease operation?
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 0:41, 07/23/2010
|
|
Oogie, How can you say they are only making a nickel profit. Surely you had to notice that the prices doubled at the same time the oil companies where stealing the oil from Iraq. Please explain to me how they can get oil for free, charge record high prices and only make a nickel profit on the deal. To answer your question, I DO NOT CARE IF THEY GO BROKE AND CEASE OPERATIONS, it would be better for the enviroment anyway and the people that would get hurt the most are rich stockholders like you that do nothing but sit on your lazy but and collect dividends and spout out hatred for poor people.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 8:14, 07/23/2010
|
|
Isnt it amazing how people forget!
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 9:47, 07/23/2010
|
|
Lazy nonsense- the information is there to read if you look for it. Governments combined get about 10 times as much in taxes on your gallon of gasoline as the oil company gets in profit. And governments get taxes from everyone who get any gain from gasoline. Common, if you wish the companies to go out of business, do not buy their products!
|
|
commonsense
|
Posted 10:36, 07/23/2010
|
|
Oogie, There is nothing to look up. The government had not added any more taxes when they started getting the oil free of charge out of Iraq and at the same time doubled the prices. I am sorry but only a complete idiot would beleive the nickel profit BS. There is no way they could stay in business now with them only making a nickel when we get gas. You will never make me feel pity for those millionairs you think are barely making ends meet. Why don't you realize the millionairs and their greed are the problem.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 18:29, 07/23/2010
|
|
Let's put together the comments of common thus far on this thread and take the consequences of those comments to their logical conclusion. Here goes: People who invest in big corporations are greedy parasites. For example, let's say a person who worked for 40 years and invested several hundred dollars per year in the stocks of corporations has reinvested those dividends in the stock- plus paying income tax each year on those dividends. The stock has increased some in share price, with many ups and downs in the price over the years. The stock pays out a dividend of 5%, better than many corporations. This greedy scum now has stock valued at about $100,000.00 and is getting about $5,000.00 per year (about $417.00 per month equivalent) to supplement his Social Security which is about $1200.00 per month for a total of $1617.00 per month. This greedy scum also must pay taxes on the stock dividends, How dare he save and invest by limiting his personal spending for those 40 years to now satisfy his greedy lusts with this windfall income? He should instead in generosity donate all this accumulated wealth to the government- or should have it confiscated- and depend on the government alone to sustain him. In other words, he should become the parasite he formerly was accused of being when he actually was trying to provide for his own needs.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 7:37, 07/30/2010
|
Oogie,
Interesting post. I have another take on the situation you describe that has nothing to do with the investor as much as the company I have recently considered.
Lets say you are an independent company and you are growing and you need money to grow. So you have two ways to go.
You can go borrow the money and pay the loan off and you know that will work but thats not good enough and you want to grow faster---you think and hope---So you decide to sell stock to pay for the loan and you borrow more, get more, have to produce more and on top of that you have to share not only the productivity of the company through dividends---interest but now you have this loan to pay off and the interest involved with that?
Seems to me that when a company does that and some sucker like you and I come along that the deck is already stacked to the point that unless we get in and out in an appropriate time we are screwed from the get go.
Wealth isnt built on debt. Wealth is built on savings and when its built the oldfashioned way the way that takes into account slow measured growth with employee profit sharing as part of the compensation package then People have an interest and work harder so the company will be more successful.
The whole idea of debt begets wealth is preposterous and idiots like you and me have been buying it. When in the end the buy and hold stradegy actually yields a small percentage of profits most of the time that we were getting dividends and that is why you and I are told. Asset allocation, buy and hold we are discouraged from buying low and selling high.
We provide the capital to keep the game going and a grand shell game it is.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 8:18, 07/30/2010
|
|
The folks who preach class envy, as does "common" and some others here, would punish any who have gained by saving and investing. The punishment it by taxing. The money is then spent on matters not mentioned in the Constitution and is just wasted.
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 1:1, 08/01/2010
|
Faith and Family: Obama Skips Scouts for Daytime TV:
Perhaps this was simply a question of core audience. Since 1937, when the Boy Scout
Jamboree was launched, the president of the United States (who serves as Honorary
Chairman of the Boy Scouts of America) has been invited to speak at the event. While
it's not unprecedented for presidents to skip the event -- for example, George W.
Bush missed out in 2001 due to bad weather and Ronald Reagan never attended a
Jamboree in person -- Barack Obama has ignited protest because he missed the event
due to a scheduling conflict: His appearance on the daytime gabfest "The View,"
followed by fundraising stops while in New York City. According to the Media
Research Center, "This appearance [on "The View"] will mark the first time in
history that a sitting president will be on a daytime talk show."
Instead, Boy Scouts from across the country saw Barack Obama on video addressing
them with a canned message of Hope 'n' Change while millions of Americans who
presumably have nothing more pressing to do but watch daytime television were
treated to the fawning glorification of Obama by the show's mostly leftist cast and
studio audience.
Come to think of it, the Boy Scouts weren't missing much. With the moral standards
of the 100-year-old organization constantly battered by Obama's minions and allies,
perhaps it's best that he kept his distance from the gathering and hung out with a
crowd that understood his need and desire for admiration. It was one less problem
the Boy Scouts had to "Be Prepared" for.
PP
|
|
MEDIC
|
Posted 15:50, 08/01/2010
|
|
up
|
|
FED UP
|
Posted 18:31, 08/01/2010
|
walks, you and the people like you have no f******* idea how stupid you are, do you?
How long has it been since you and the good people of Yadkin county were crying, bitching and moaning about the president making a speech to school kids on TV? Remember that? You were so afraid he would use some kind of damn mind bending voodo on them and capture their brains, remember?
You bitched so much, and were so afraid, the Yadkin county school system BANNED the president of the United States from speaking about getting an education to children.
Now, you're bitching because he DIDN'T speak to boy scouts!!! IN PERSON, no less!!! Where he could REALLY brainwash 'em.
Make up your ignorant, goddam mind.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 19:59, 08/01/2010
|
|
Is that why our children werent allowed to see the Presidents speech?
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 20:21, 08/01/2010
|
"Now, you're bitching because he DIDN'T speak to boy scouts!!! IN PERSON, no less!!! Where he could REALLY brainwash 'em."
Really? He can brainwash people just by speaking to them? Is that why you support him? That is a pretty cool trick.
|
|
hmm..
|
Posted 21:10, 08/01/2010
|
|
Obama spoke to FEDUP....
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 21:29, 08/01/2010
|
fedup, you gonna blow a gasket. Get a grip, man.
It is a PP copy. I 'bitched' and was 'afraid'? What the hell are you talking about? Bet you have really high blood pressure. Chill a bit, okay?
fedup:"Now, you're bitching because he DIDN'T speak to boy scouts!!! IN PERSON, no less!!! Where he could REALLY brainwash 'em.
Make up your ignorant, goddam mind"
fiesta pantalones: "Really? He can brainwash people just by speaking to them? Is that why you support him? That is a pretty cool trick."
love it!
|
|
wizard
|
Posted 8:57, 08/02/2010
|
|
Some on here are mentality challenged, and just don't understand what they say. FEDUP's{fu} doctor said as he grows up, he may grow out of his problem.
|
|
Newday
|
Posted 12:15, 08/02/2010
|
|
Fed up is just fed up. Today brings some hope we are getting the heck out of Iraq as our President promised.
|
|
mex1
|
Posted 16:0, 08/02/2010
|
|
u
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 1:27, 08/03/2010
|
|
OOgie..That was great!
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 2:22, 08/04/2010
|
What a liar that freak is! Oogie, Anyone that would LIE about military service is lower than scum. And there is the prez of this country doing just that..
How low can he go..(?)
|
|
FED UP
|
Posted 5:8, 08/04/2010
|
Oogie and walks, you 2 birds of a feather know Obama misspoke and meant his grandfather.
But, that doesnt matter to you, does it?
|
|
wizard
|
Posted 10:47, 08/04/2010
|
This is strange. When a democrat lies, it is called mispoken.
When a republican lies, it's called a lie.
I just can't understand why liberals put up with obamas mispeaking every time he says anything. That just explains the liberal mindset, "tell me what I want to hear, whether it is true or not".
|
|
Stokes
|
Posted 11:4, 08/04/2010
|
|
FU, that is the funniest explanation of the thug's speeches yet!!!!!!
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 2:57, 08/05/2010
|
OMG!!! Fedup, you ARE hilarious!
Right on, Stokes~
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 3:28, 08/06/2010
|
Just wanted to let you know - today I received my
2010 Obama Stimulus Package.
It contained two watermelon seeds, cornbread mix,
and 10 coupons to KFC. The directions were in Spanish.
Hope you get yours soon.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 6:9, 08/06/2010
|
|
Let's see now, fedup, Dan Quayle was treated kindly by the press because he misspoke when spelling "potato", right? And of course, such spelling was so crucial to the well being of our nation and world.
|
|
FED UP
|
Posted 7:53, 08/06/2010
|
|
Oogie, the best I remember, Quayle was laughed at for his mistake, but, I don't remember him being called a "liar" for it. Do you?
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 17:52, 08/06/2010
|
Quoted from another site:
“Here are some points that I believe are worth pondering re Bush tax cuts and overall governmental spending:
“Personal income taxes went from $1.235 trillion in 2001, to $1.102 trillion in 2009, a decline of 10.4% over the period. Corp. taxes went from $193.5 billion to $289.5 billion, up 49.6%, and total tax revenues increased from $2,163.7 trillion to $2,427.5 trillion, up 12.2%.
“Current expenditures went from $3,093.6 trillion to $4,989.3 trillion in 2009, up 61.3%.
“Now I just ask, which side of the equation has been the problem, taxation, which has risen, or spending, which has skyrocketed?" Do those who believe we should continue to spend to stimulate believe that it really works?”
|
|
ccrider
|
Posted 9:26, 08/07/2010
|
|
Oogie, I agree with you post on the Bush tax cuts expiring, however the thing that tee's me off is Obama's wife running around in Spain with her daughter using Air Force 2 and spending our tax dollars. The only thing he has done from day one is to Vacation, play Golf and Campaign with the Unions. Barack H Obama or Barry Soetoro I hope you shi* in your britches and no one is their to wipe it for you. I just sent him a e-mail and let him have it along with letting him know we will be at the poll's on November 2, 2010.
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 1:49, 08/08/2010
|
ccrider: It is all about them (king and queen obama). They are having a very expensive blast..with our money.
"By the end of this summer, the First Family will have been on no less than eight vacations in 2010 alone. Besides this week’s trip, there were other trips which included a trip to New York in March, Chicago in May, Los Angeles in June, Camp David and Maine in July. Later in July, they will be going to the Florida Gulf Coast (Then Spain) and finally spending 10 days in Martha’s Vineyard starting on August 19th."
charlotte paper
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 2:3, 08/08/2010
|
Tantaros goes on to criticize the first lady for traveling abroad instead of within the United States, something that would help the U.S. economy.
"Michelle Obama seems more like a modern-day Marie Antoinette - the French queen who spent extravagantly on clothes and jewels without a thought for her subjects' plight - than an average mother of two," she writes. "...
I don't begrudge anyone rest and relaxation when they work hard. We all need downtime - the First Family included. It's the extravagance of Michelle Obama's trip and glitzy destination contrasted with President Obama's demonization of the rich that smacks of hypocrisy and perpetuates a disconnect between the country and its leaders."
Amen!
|
|
Damn Yankee
|
Posted 21:32, 08/11/2010
|
|
Michell out to get extended cable to relax like the rest of us.
|
|
Walks the Talk
|
Posted 1:16, 08/12/2010
|
The Gulf Smells of Treason!!!
1. 4 weeks before the BP blowout, Soetoro (Obama) builds his alibi for the coming Gulf tragedy ---"I am opening offshore drilling in all the Coastal U.S." Goldman Sachs dumps nearly all of its stock (40%+) in BP, a profitable winner. Days before, they dump the rest!
2. BP ignores the advice of all the drilling contractors on making the well safe. British Petroleum had a manager directing drilling who had never been on an offshore rig before and purposefully ignored all safety warnings. BP ignores TransOceanic warnings about a problem with the blowout preventer. BP ignores repeated warnings on numerous problems from numerous sub-contractors.
3. The well explodes under suspicious circumstances, but BP does nothing immediately to control it. Why? And the Dutch offer to have it controlled in 48 hours. They are ignored.
4. Soetoro (Obama) sacks his National Intelligence Director (a Navy Admiral) who, because of Federal Laws, cannot comment on intelligence or the reason why he was sacked.
5. BP top-kills the well but fails as was predicted by numerous oil professionals causing downhole damage to the well which has caused a massive pollution of the southern U.S. The way they bungled everything, the Gulf will be dead for decades!
6. Soetoro (Obama) now declares ALL drilling suspended in the Gulf and makes numerous PR trips to the Gulf to look as though he is outraged.
7. John Podesta is Soetoro's (Obama's) man that built his cabinet and all his Czars.
8. John Podesta is also head of George Soros' Center for American Progress (a socialist organization dedicated to killing capitalism in America and building, according to Soros, "A New World Order"). John Podesta's brother is the lead lobbyist for British Petroleum, whose services are now in huge demand.
9.Soros was a major contributor to Soetoro's (Obama's) campaign.
10. Soros invested $900 million in Petrobras, the Brazilian government controlled oil company that plans on drilling offshore in Brazil , yet cannot get the deepwater rigs operating in the Gulf.
11. Days after Soros' investment, Barry Soetoro (Obama) grants $2 billion of U.S. taxpayer's dollars to Petrobras to drill offshore in Brazil ....the company nets over $15 Billion annually.
12. U.S. drilling companies must do something with their now idled rigs and are planning on moving them off to South America ---- to Petrobras which will supply the oil to the U.S. as an import!
13. Barry Soetoro (Obama) gives a patsy White House Oval Office speech on the disaster but, also during the speech, he states the need for Carbon Taxes.....Cap and Trade! (Go figure)
14. The carbon tax exchange will be based in, you guessed it, Chicago... and called the CCX...The CHICAGO Climate Exchange
The Joyce Foundation --A private U.S. foundation which provides funding and support to initiatives focusing on education, environment and employment in the Great Lakes region. The Joyce Foundation was established in 1948 by Beatrice Joyce Kean of Chicago . Since its inception, the foundation has made grants of more than $600 million. Some of those grants include $1.1 million to Richard Sandor in 2000-2001 to create the Chicago Climate Exchange. Former Board of Directors' members include Barry Soetoro (aka-Barack Obama) (1994-2002) and Valerie Jarrett, his top adviser.
Who will benefit from the Chicago Climate Exchange? You guessed it!!!...Obama and his buddies, Goldman Sachs and the Chicago crew.
Who will benefit from Obama's shutdown of drilling in the Gulf? You guessed it!!!...Obama and his buddy, George Soros
Who benefits from Obama sending $2 Billion of taxpayer dollars to a company that Nets $15 Billion per year? You guessed it!!!...Obama and his buddies.
Who is Obama getting to pay for all of this again? You guessed it!!!...The American Citizens.
Barry Soetoro (Barack Hussein Obama) is intent on the total destruction of America. He does nothing to stop the Illegal invasion from Mexico, he does nothing to stop the blowout, he DOES NOTHING to stop the downfall of America while he plays golf, travels to Ohio for 10 minute speeches at a cost of $750,000, listens to Paul McCartney concerts, and goes to baseball games in NY. What do you expect from someone that never produced his birth certificate, has gone around the world apologizing for America 's past actions, and bowing to the head of the Muslim World.
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 0:55, 08/19/2010
|
The lying thug muslim racist long-legged mac-daddy and family are going on ANOTHER vacation..Martha's Vineyard for 10 days. Bue he does say that things will be better for we the people in 2015.
What a sob.
|
|
white american
|
Posted 6:47, 08/19/2010
|
|
The conservatives really need to thank the liberals for putting obama in office. The liberals have shown the US why there will never be another negro voted POTUS again.
|
|
walks the talk
|
Posted 2:53, 08/26/2010
|
If he does say so himself:
"After 18 months, I have never been more confident that our nation is headed in the right direction." --Barack Obama on the economy (pp)
Yep, all those vacations and golf and dates and more vacations...on the people's money- I guess things do look pretty good for the lying muslim long legged mac-daddy racist thug.
|
|
Stokes
|
Posted 9:58, 08/26/2010
|
|
6 vacations in 18 months!!!!! That is why he wanted to be president - vacate on the taxpayer's dime all the while that 10% of them are unemployed and losing their homes. He is a lying, smiling thug that cares about ONLY himself, that racist wife, and his kids.
|
|
SBD
|
Posted 10:42, 08/27/2010
|
|
A new Gallup Poll of 275,000 adults this morning finds that while the Democrat's overall approval ratings have dropped across all faiths -- even those Americans without any -- Muslims continue to approve of him the most.
|
|
Oogie
|
Posted 19:32, 08/27/2010
|
One percent transaction tax is proposed
President Obama's finance team is recommending a transaction tax. His plan is to sneak it in after the November election to keep it under the radar. This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution i. e. Banks, Credit Unions, etc.. Any deposit you make, or move around within your account, i. e. transfer to, will have a 1% tax charged. If your pay check or your social Security or whatever is direct deposit, 1% tax charged. If you hand carry a check in to deposit, 1% tax charged, If you take cash in to deposit, 1% tax charged.This is from the man who promised that if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn. This tax will affect people at all income levels.
|
|
SBD
|
Posted 14:15, 08/28/2010
|
I didn't verify this, but I'm sending it anyway.
Subject: Fw: VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
The fact is, it is not his citizenship that is being questioned. the opinion that will be reviewed by the Supreme Court is the definition of Naturalized citizen verses natural born citizen and how it is applied to a persons eligibility to hold public office.
VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
AP - WASHINGTON D.C. -
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College . Released today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California . The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.
T his document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification to serve as president.
G ary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U..S. Attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter...
LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS, THE MEDIA WON'T !
Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?
While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?
So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S. .. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. .. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.
If you Don't care that Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Delete this, and then lower your American Flag to half-staff, because the U.S. Constitution is already on life-support, and won't survive much longer.
If you care then Forward this to as many patriotic Americans as you can, because our country is being looted and ransacked
|
|
fiesta pantalones
|
Posted 21:31, 08/28/2010
|
|
I have just got to say, be careful what you ask for. Let's say that this stuff pans out and Obama is shown to not be eligible to be President. For God's sake, we will get Joe Biden in office!!! That retard would be actually be the worse thing since Carter.
|
|
weezie
|
Posted 12:47, 08/29/2010
|
|
How DID Obama get to run for president of the U.S. if he did not show his birth certificate? Can anyone explain with facts?
|
|
SBD
|
Posted 14:19, 08/29/2010
|
|
The officals in the democratic party supposedly did the background check on our commander in thief and as usual they halfasred it. They did just what has become common practice in both parties- get behind whatever you think you can win with no matter if it is a goat with yellow toes just like every presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan. If he was legit all the smoke and mirrors would have disappeared by now. He did show a birth cert. and it was not checked out and the officals knew they could cloud the issues with all types of political roadblocks until it was too late to stop the mess they knew he would create. Another lesson for the gullable in watch our freedoms dwindle.
|
|
|
